Originally posted: Dec. 22, 2008
Any candidate for the Presidency of the USA who willfully deprives the people of access to his birth records and other relevant documentation IS OVERRIDING THE PROTECTIONS OF THE US CONSTITUTION. It is yet another example of the perverting of the great Bible-based Christian Constitution that was originally given to the US by the founding fathers.
The US Constitution PROTECTS ALL US CITIZENS AGAINST A PRESIDENT HAVING FOREIGN INFLUENCES ON HIM, BY ONLY ALLOWING A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN (not just a “citizen”) OF THE UNITED STATES TO BE PRESIDENT. Therefore any person, Government agency or authority which blocks or does not allow access to the necessary documentation is DEPRIVING THE US CITIZENRY OF THE PROTECTION AGAINST A FOREIGN-INFLUENCED PRESIDENT GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
US Law makes illegal such behavior and allows either the Attorney General, if he so chooses, or any individuals in the US jurisdiction to take action at law to guarantee the Constitutional protections are maintained. The relevant laws (at least two of them) are as follows:
1) For the benefit of all citizens, and people within the jurisdiction of the United States:
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1983
§ 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
2) For the Attorney General:
U.S.C. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 136 > SUBCHAPTER IX >
Part B § 14141
§ 14141. Cause of action
(a) Unlawful conduct
It shall be unlawful for any governmental authority, or any agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
(b) Civil action by Attorney General
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of paragraph (1)  has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
 So in original. Probably should be “subsection (a) of this section”.